Barack Obama came into the spotlight like a tornado but instead of promising destruction he wafted through with hope and change and he did it with kindness, honesty and forthrightness plus he humbly asked for help with his mission. Therein lays the dilemma that the people did not follow his example choosing instead to simulate lost sheep wandering oblivious to their stake and participation in the task at hand.

Unfortunately this is being echoed throughout all countries suffering the indignity of recession and depression because the leaders on the ground are also lost in the quagmire of hapless practices. There are solutions and these have been suggested to us since the dawning of time but blindness overshadows clarity and we have the repetitive scenario of the blind leading the blind.

When we choose leaders like Obama to represent our interests in the highest offices it is our duty to assist them in everyway but without a follow up plan we are clueless as to how we may be effective. We may blame the political machine, individual political parties, religious and business leaders or we can blame green men in outer space.

Whichever route we choose there has to be a fundamental plan of action with direction for the smallest group to follow as well as the biggest groups representing their respective interests. Individual lobbying has no place in a society that desires advancement because if we all do not advance then our civilisation lays dormant in primitive schedules and practices.

When Moses was leading his flock from Egypt it was suggested to him to set up mastermind groups as a way of managing the daily tasks thus delegating the onerous and tedious tasks in the hands of those on the ground and Moses could then facilitate his time to the more demanding objectives of his journey. It worked largely but like all things human involving separate interests brings mostly trivial travails but it is essential to not allow them to enlarge thus creating even larger problems.

Every country or entity has one leader and it falls into that leader’s workload to diversify each portfolio into the hands of the most competent managers. Each country or state has counties and within these are townslands and cities with their own marginal electorate of counselors and managers. It is with these that the task of organizing the members of each society lays but few if any actually think of setting up a mastermind concept and as a consequence the people are adrift apart from the real happenings of society. This follows the ladder to the President, King or Queen and Prime Minister or whatever the title may be to bear the full responsibility of inept behaviours that need not be present. Basically if local government did its job effectively the successes of the state or country would be real and tangible developing a more positive outlook.

There are too many self interests in government where the little picture takes the place of the larger picture and as long as this practice continues the leaders at the top will be blamed for the ineffectiveness of the leaders down the chain. Everyone wants a definitive leadership to produce amazing results but those results cannot be attained unless everyone in the chain is strong and forthright. If we cannot do this collectively then self interests groups will continue to manipulate and the general populace shall be the fall guy.

We can change governments and leaders all day long but if we do not embrace the change in our own life and our circle of influence then leaders like Obama shall continue to be disappointed while continuing to do something the rest will not do. They bear the full responsibility that is not theirs alone to carry; it is the responsibility of all of us and we need to walk side by side with our leaders not throwing misdirected criticism!

Sincerely,
Tomas Coimin

-
About the Author:
Coimin is a master of motivational techniques with a strong desire to help others seek greater peace through positive self-esteem. Based in Co. Tipperary Ireland. Through the years it has been very rewarding to receive acknowledgments from readers indicating the benefits of my writings and thus I pray to continue to deliver quality pieces to continue the trends of previous successes. I write and publish poetry and short stories too but my chief aim is to work towards strengthening self-esteem while eliminating the ravages caused by abuses whether financial, physical, sexual or mental.Tomas may be reached at selfesteemawareness@gmail.com
Article Source

Times Are Tough, But An Upbeat Outlook Will Prevail

To the Editor:

Today, the news is dominated by the story of 33 Chilean miners being rescued after 69 days trapped more than two thousand feet below the Earth’s surface. It’s a profound story of love, faith, redemption, and of the bright side of human nature. Look at what we can do for each other when we put forth our best efforts!

Metaphorically speaking, we are all trapped underground at different times in our lives. Maybe there was a time when your job, for instance, made you feel like a king in a castle… but now (after things went badly and shook your confidence) you feel trapped under the rubble of it all. Perhaps you are feeling your age, and what was once a strong body that would obey your every command now feels trapped under years of fat-building sloth and avarice. Maybe you used to wake up with smile on your face and a song in your heart, but now, after a steady diet of bad news and setbacks, you feel like you’re trapped in a funeral procession. On bad days, it can even feel like your own!

They say you are what you eat… I think the same is true of your mind. You want to be informed and engaged, but with so much bad news out there, it’s hard to feed your mind anything like a balanced diet, and it’s easy to slide into negativity, anxiety, even depression. Great, positive stories like today’s report on the miner rescue do seem to come by too infrequently – so take some time today to absorb it. Reflect on how heroic the rescuers have been, and how patient and faithful the miners must’ve been. Is there a lesson in all this for you? Like the miners being pulled back to the surface, see if you can pull something up out of yourself that will help you escape whatever’s trapping you. It may be as simple as the realization that, for all your troubles and woes, you have it good. You are lucky. You’re blessed. You’ve been sleeping in a bed for the last 69 days, not in a smelly hole half-a-mile below the ground.

Then, take action. Action is the best prescription against the greatest threat to your well-being (worry). If your job is crumbling, make a new one for yourself. Starting a home-based business could be like drilling a hole to the surface through which you can escape if things go badly. If you’re feeling fat and lazy, make a change… you can at least start drinking more water, taking a good vitamin, and refusing some of the processed food-garbage you sometimes find within your reach.

And you can seek out the good news. Upbeat, “feel good” stories are hard to find these days (and you REALLY want to mute those campaign commercials)… but if you dig around, occasionally you find a nugget of pure gold.

by Michael D. Hume, M.S. 

-
About the Author:
 
Michael Hume is a speaker, writer, and consultant specializing in helping people maximize their potential and enjoy inspiring lives. As part of his inspirational leadership mission, he coaches executives and leaders in growing their personal sense of well-being through wealth creation and management, along with personal vitality.
Those with an entrepreneurial spirit who want to make money “one less thing to worry about” can learn more about working with Michael at http://oneyearplan.net/michaeldhume
Anyone wanting to jump-start their vitality can browse through the best (and most travel-friendly) nutraceuticals on the market at http://shop.enivausa.com/239824
Michael and his wife, Kathryn, divide their time between homes in California and Colorado. They are very proud of their offspring, who grew up to include a homemaker, a rock star, a service talent, and a television expert. Two grandchildren also warm their hearts! Visit Michael’s web site at http://michaelhume.net
Article Source

To be a politician now with a unique perspective combined with a charismatic personality shall spell success beyond any wildest stretch of the imagination. This recession is threatening to double dip in every country that has been destroyed by its consequences and will take invigorating innovative responses to reverse its swirl.

Unlike tornados and other natural challenges that we have no control over our hands are not as confined in dealing with economic woes. The obsession with diversity needs to be restricted and like the depression of the early 1900′s the media need to be asked to curtail their advertising of negativity while focusing more space to successful ventures. If you keep pouring vitriol on any substance that substance no matter how strong shall be depleted of all energy and perhaps refuse to resuscitate. Perhaps that toxic aluminum sludge spill in Hungry is proverbial as well as factual and a lesson could be gleaned from the event.

We are all in this world together and as such we shall take control and punish appropriately those responsible irrespective of position and by and large the general populace are resourceful thus shall resume control. Apathy serves no one and likewise complacency is a self destructive activity and thus need to be shed allowing positive growth to resume.

Curiously enough unlike the financial states of the world that may have dipped as much as fifty percent however the population did not dip by an equal amount. In fact the population is growing and with it possibilities await those who shall shirk recessive attitudes arriving at positive solutions enhancing a turn around. We may have to accept less wages but which is better: empty pockets, abandoned homes or sustenance that benefits everyone?

How funny too that so much is invested in bad news with companies like CNN, BBC, SKY News, France 24 and Euro News to mention a few giving humungous salaries to the reporters that come up with the best of the worst stories imaginable. TV dramas like detective shows are widely accepted and feel good shows are disdained as if they were in fact detrimental to survival. In fact if there are no bad guys or more in a movie it shall have limited success or perhaps even face absolute failure. What does this tell us of our society?

One last question: is it an oxymoron to have enlightened politician in the one sentence? Perhaps it is even more incongruous to believe that such a possibility could exist beyond the remotest possibility of a few but definitely not existing in any great numbers. Of course if you believe that a politician who can wave at Russia from her back yard is enlightened then we are all doomed! Although I do love soccer and love being able to see the mountains of south Tipperary from my window so perhaps there is hope. Alleluia! Besides I can wave at the leprechauns and the faeries now that the Celtic New Year is fast approaching hmmm it is the same time as Halloween…oooh! Magical!

Sincerely,
Tomas Coimin

-
About the Author:
Coimin is a master of motivational techniques with a strong desire to help others seek greater peace through positive self-esteem. Based in Co. Tipperary Ireland. Through the years it has been very rewarding to receive acknowledgments from readers indicating the benefits of my writings and thus I pray to continue to deliver quality pieces to continue the trends of previous successes. I write and publish poetry and short stories too but my chief aim is to work towards strengthening self-esteem while eliminating the ravages caused by abuses whether financial, physical, sexual or mental.Tomas may be reached at selfesteemawareness@gmail.com
Article Source

Remember that story that consumed our news media three months ago about the U.S. Department of Agriculture manager who was accused of being a racist? Yeah, remember, she was caught on tape saying she wouldn’t be zealous in helping a farmer because he was white? And it turns out those quotes were taken out of context from a speech in which she was talking about something that happened years ago, a story she was using as an exhortation to her audience never to act that way?

Yeah, that was crazy. People trying to drum up more racism in America. While that was going on, another group of “media journalists” were asserting that the “tea party is full of racists” – never mind the troubling facts that the “tea party” is a large, non-centralized movement with no clear identity (“journalists” hate anything that isn’t centralized) and that there was absolutely no evidence anywhere that anyone in association with any tea party event or group ever exhibited any racist behaviors.

No evidence? No problem. Not in this age of what passes as “journalism” in this country.

Here we are now, three weeks before the mid-term U.S. elections, and it’s Stupid Season. Judging from the ads we see and hear in a constant daily bombardment, we are supposed to be stupid enough to believe anything, and evidence would only confuse us.

A commercial in Florida pulls sound-bites from a candidate’s speech that makes him sound like a right-wing Christian zealot who expects his wife to obey him… he was giving a speech in which he was making exactly the opposite point.

A major governor’s race is mired in an accusation that one candidate employed and then heartlessly fired a self-proclaimed illegal immigrant. The candidate’s opponent (who happens to be the state attorney general and has done nothing to prosecute the only sure criminal in the case – the illegal immigrant) asserts that the other candidate knew she was employing an illegal when it was to her economic benefit, and then quickly scrapped the poor unfortunate when she decided to run for governor because it would look bad, of course. There are absolutely no facts to substantiate any of those assertions; in fact, there are a few facts that refute them.

A national ad proclaims that one party’s supporters are taking “secret foreign money” – it even shows a ruffling stack of Chinese yuan bills – and paints the picture for Us Stupid (U.S.) Dummies that, basically, the Chinese are putting forth that evil party’s candidates to take over the country and do their bidding. The U.S. Chamber of Commerce is implicated (those capitalist pigs!). David Axelrod, the president’s longtime friend and advisor, appeared on a “media journalism” program over the weekend and was actually asked if he had any evidence of this serious charge – in reply to which Mr. Axelrod asked the “journalist” whether he had any evidence that it WASN’T true.

No evidence? No problem.

These are supposed to be our leaders. Oh, boy. I suggest you not wait around to be led by these people, because you don’t want to go where they’re going! Start a business of your own so you can build your entrepreneurial skills and have an income of your very own… don’t expect your employer to take care of you. Start a health-kick so you can keep yourself energetic and vital… not just because you’ll need that energy to drive your business and run your household, but because you can’t expect the government’s health care program to take care of you. And start getting a real education about the global conspiracy against your money, before it’s too late.

It’s Stupid Season. Let the stupid have their season… meanwhile, take this time to quietly build a future around personal responsibility and personal values. After all, if you don’t stand for something, you’ll fall for anything.

Sincerely,

Michael D. Hume, M.S.
-
About the Author:
 
Michael Hume is a speaker, writer, and consultant specializing in helping people maximize their potential and enjoy inspiring lives. As part of his inspirational leadership mission, he coaches executives and leaders in growing their personal sense of well-being through wealth creation and management, along with personal vitality.
Those with an entrepreneurial spirit who want to make money “one less thing to worry about” can learn more about working with Michael at http://oneyearplan.net/michaeldhume
Anyone wanting to jump-start their vitality can browse through the best (and most travel-friendly) nutraceuticals on the market at http://shop.enivausa.com/239824
Michael and his wife, Kathryn, divide their time between homes in California and Colorado. They are very proud of their offspring, who grew up to include a homemaker, a rock star, a service talent, and a television expert. Two grandchildren also warm their hearts! Visit Michael’s web site at http://michaelhume.net
Article Source

Well, the answer is easy, it is sharp,  yes! Here is why? The relationship between the United States of America (USA) and the United Nations (UN) is like the relationships between rich and poor.  The USA share of the UN budget was 25% until the year 2001, where the United State was assessed to pay 22% of the annual UN regular Budget, In 2006 calendar year, the 22% amounted to $423,464,855. In 2006, the United States and 16 other nations were assessed to pay 86.408% of the UN budget. The other (over 200) nations of the world pay the rest which is about 14% .

Historically, the United States since 1986, provided the UN with 25% of its budget; the USSR provided 10.5%; Angola 0.01% and Saudi Arabia 0.86%. America claimed that such an investment should have its rewards. If the ‘Big Five’ withdrew their financial support or reduced it to the level of other nations in the UN, then the UN itself would face near bankruptcy. There was little the UN could do if members failed to pay their contribution.

In December 2000, the Fifth Committee voted to lower the ceiling rate from 25% to 22% for the Regular Budget. The US had promised to pay its longstanding debt to the UN in exchange for lower assessments. Half a decade later, the US still owes around US$500 million to the UN Regular Budget.

 The UN Five Core Tasks according to Kofi Annan in  2006, the previous UN Secretary, involve Peace and Security,  Economic and Social Issues, Humanitarian tasks, and Development. The fifth category running through all these tasks was Human Rights Issue.  In that year, the United Nations has often failed to live up to its responsibility to promote human rights, while the killing was ongoing in many places in the Middle East. Organizations and individuals in the member states were reminded to make the protection of rights a reality in every country. The United States, however, according to the scale of assessment, can make or break the UN capacity to fulfill its tasks.

 The scale of assessments, however,  reflects a country’s capacity to pay (the scale is measured by factors such as a country’s national income and size of population). The Peacekeeping Budget assessments for instance, are based on the Regular Budget rates, but with discounts for poor countries. The five permanent members of the Security Council, who approve all peacekeeping operations, pay extra fees to compensate for those discounts. In other words, when poor countries cannot contribute to the UN budget, (the  minimum rate of 0.001% to the Regular Budget for poor countries.) the extra pay from rich countries compensate for the poor nations share. A “ceiling” rate sets the maximum amount of any member state’s assessed share of the regular and Peacekeeping Budgets. The US is the only member that is affected by those ceilings.

 The UN as we know, was founded with the objective of preventing intergovernmental wars through a collective security system. This task could not be fulfilled however, due to the blockade of the Security Council and the failings of the system. Emphasis was placed on a new range of tasks because of this. New global issues such as the increasing scarcity of natural resources, the destruction of the environment and the increasing climate change, the rapid growth in the world population, and new forms of threat to freedom and the whole of humanity due to weapons of mass destruction and internal state conflicts came into the picture, where the United States contribution to the UN is vital for the organization to fulfil its tasks mentioned above.

 In conclusion, even though the US pays less than its share of the world economy. But compared with other nations, the US  still pay more than other nations collectively such as: United Kingdom ( 5.5%) , Italy (5.1%), Canada (2.6%),  Spain (2.5%), Brazil (2.4%), and Republic of Korea (1.8%) ,  and tens of other poor nations. The same can be said about Japan and its share of (19.5%) of the UN regular budget. That’s why  the United States and Japan to a less extent, has the key to bankrupt the UN. This role in globalization matters cannot be undermined, in the same time cannot give the United States the master role of ruling the world. www.dryahyatv.com  (738 words)

-
About the Author:
Hasan A. Yahya is an American writer, scholar, and professor of philosophy. He’s the honorary member of the Arab & Muslim Writers Union-A&MWU). Has a 2 Ph.d degrees from MSU. He published 40 books (29 Arabic and 11 English), and 230 plus articles on sociology, religion, psychology, politics, poetry, and short stories. Philosophically, his writings concern logic, justice and human rights worldwide. Dr. Yahya is the author of Crescentologism: The Moon Theory,  and Islam Finds its Way, on Amazon. He’s an expert on Arab and Islamic cultures, and was invited to several TV shows and international conferences on religion, world affairs and future strategic planning. www.askdryahya.com
Article Source

The mainstream German media (newspapers, radio, and motion pictures) had, by 1936, been forcibly intimidated by the Nazi government into publishing and broadcasting only Nazi propaganda to the German people. The publishers of the smaller newspapers and magazines in various German cities, who refused to go along with the fascist Nazi agenda, were harshly seized by the brown-shirted SA and, eventually, the SS, and shipped-off to concentration camps. Yet, despite the attempts of Joseph Goebbels, the Nazi Minister of Propaganda, to indoctrinate the entire German populace with Nazi lies, approximately 18 percent of all the adult Germans had, and maintained, a silent but adamant assurance that Adolf Hitler was not the Christian that he had claimed to be, but, rather, an atheistic megalomaniac. From 1933 until 1945, around 43 percent of the adult Germans remained unsure about Hitler’s Christian principles, while fully supporting the Nazi regime politically and militarily. It was actually the 39 percent of the adult German citizens, and 99 percent of the German soldiers, sailors, airmen, and the Gestapo, who fully believed in Adolf Hitler, that constituted the means of monitoring and controlling the behaviors of the German dissidents and eventual doubters throughout the course of the 2nd World War.

Do these percentages from the past sound recently familiar? In the Friday, August 20, 2010, edition of the “Washington Post,” a Pew Research Center poll was published showing that 18 percent of the American poll-sample firmly believed that Barack Obama is not a Christian, but a Muslim. A surprising 43 percent of those polled reported that they were unsure whether Obama is a Christian or a Muslim, and only 34 percent of the respondents reported a firm belief that Obama is Christian. Interestingly, in 1936, the dissident 18 percent of the population were absolutely correct in their belief about Hitler not being a Christian, despite what the controlling majority proclaimed. Beneath the current Pew poll results was the article written by Jon Cohen and Michael D. Shear, which seemed to reflect the words of Joseph Goebbels strongly worded 1934 German press release, “Adolf Hitler is, without a doubt, the Christian ambassador for God.” Cohen and Shear disputed the unbelieving 18 percent of the recent Pew poll by saying, “Americans increasingly are convinced – incorrectly – that President Obama is a Muslim, and a growing number are thoroughly confused about his religion.” If, perhaps, the “Washington Post,” the “Los Angeles Times,” the “Chicago Tribune,” “The New York Times,” “The Wall Street Journal” and other major U.S. newspapers readily dispute the growing belief among adult members of the American electorate that Obama is not a Christian, but a Muslim, there will be a desperate clamor in the Democratic Party leadership to assert that the voters are absolutely wrong. This might also be the case if CNN, CBS, NBC, ABC and even PBS weigh into the controversy by calling the voters ignorant of the facts.

Nonetheless, if the American voters go to the polls in November 2010, with an increasing number of them saying, “If Obama looks like a Muslim, talks like a Muslim, and acts like a Muslim, he must be a Muslim,” the Democratic Party is in for a big shock, when Harry Reid, Nancy Pelosi, and the majority of the infamous Democrats who voted for fascist Obamacare, and the economically disparaging Stimulus Bill, are voted out of Congress. But it’s much more of a crying shame when a standing U.S. President has gone to the unscrupulous lengths that Obama has gone to keep his long form birth certificate and educational records away from public disclosure, in order to keep from being exposed as a person basically ineligible to be President. A good point to remember, and ponder, about Barack Hussain Obama is that when he was under Islamic instruction as a young person in Indonesia, he had a different name and had taken upon himself a Muslim bond and obligation that, according to the “Koran” and Islamic tradition, cannot be broken. And a noted scripture in the “Koran,” endorsed by Mohammed himself, is that Muslims are allowed, and encouraged, to deceive the infidel by lying, in order to subdue and control that infidel. This fact, in and of itself, is enough to create reasonable doubt about Barack Obama’s Christian faith in the minds of reasonable

-
About the Author:
Norton R. Nowlin holds M.A. and B.A. degrees from the University of Texas at Tyler plus one year of law school at Thomas Jefferson School of Law, in San Diego, California.  He also holds an ABA-approved paralegal certification from Edmonds Community College, in Lynnwood, Washington, is a 1985 graduate of the 72nd San Diego County Sheriff’s Academy, at Southwestern College in Chula Vista, California, and worked professionally as a California peace officer. In addition to the foregoing, Mr. Nowlin’s educational prowess extends 70 semester hours beyond a master’s degree in sociology, history, and law. Mr. Nowlin is presently a paralegal, free-lance writer, and political commentator/journalist. He is a published op-ed essayist for the “Seattle Times,” while also a freelance fiction writer and published poet. He is married, the father of three grown children, and resides with his wife, the renown math and science tutor, Diane C. Nowlin, and their two very intelligent cats, in Northern Virginia.`
Article Source

The President is important, yes. He is our icon, our face, our leader. He can hire and fire people, and he can try to push whatever agenda he wants, for the most part. What the President doesn’t have is the power to change the course of American history in one single vote. This power rests in the hands of the Supreme Court. These 9 justices are what makes the major decisions that really impact our lives. Just look at the Citizens United case. The Court ruled that Corporations have the same rights as humans do under the First Amendment. And what was granted to them was the right to spend unlimited amounts of money on political broadcasts. This case goes much further, so please research it in-depth. The court granted this power to the Corporations, and even foreign corporations have this same power. Foreign? Really? This was a major setback in what Americans have fought against for so long. This is why the 2012 election is more important than just electing a face, an icon.

In 2012 we face either Obama, or a Republican. What you get with a Republican, coupled with the Citizens United case, is the possibility of getting a Corporate spokes dummy in the Supreme Court. America cannot survive if that happens. So much corporate money will be pumped into advertising and the election of a Republican to ensure that the next Justice is bought and paid for. We cannot let this happen. If you’re a Democrat or Independent that disagrees with Obama, at least know that his Supreme Court Justice nominee will be fighting the fight for Americans not AmeriCo’s. Or quite possibly ForeignCo’s. So, America’s survival isn’t just pinned on how the next Court votes, it’s also pinned on YOUR next vote.

-
About the Author:
By Peter Schettkoe of Death&Taxes Designs
Article Source

This is a prime opening for the Republicans, yet in many ways it’s the Republicans who truly seem at war with one another.  From the media’s perspective, the party or Reagan now seems to view “moderate’ as a term only surpassed in distain by that deadly label – “liberal”.

The Democrats are doing their best to portray Republicans as the party of ‘no” and unless they begin to propose workable alternatives to the Democrat’s agenda, they run the risk of being viewed mainly as obstructionists, as opposed to problem solvers.  Whereas the county does seem to be veering to the right, any true success will most likely not come by making a hard right.  Britain tried that and their Conservatives paid for it.  It took a centrist, David Cameron, to begin to bring Britain’s conservatives back to the forefront.

Michael Steele doesn’t seem to be the chairman that the RNC needs at this time.  As Obama’s ratings nosedive, the Republicans need a strategic co-coordinator to rally the troops and come up with a strategic unified message, as opposed to several splintered messages. The party also needs to develop some strong presidential front runners.  Sarah Palin is definitely a strong brand name, and a wealthy one.  ABC new estimated that Palin had made in excess of $12 million since stepping down as Alaska’s governor. Yet a recent CNN pool has Obama beating her by 55% to 42% in a head-to-head battle.  More worrisome for the Palin camp, 69% stated she was not qualified to be president.  Obviously much can change between not and 2012, but at present there seems to be no urgency to develop a strong conservative platform with room for moderates.

For now, many view the Republicans as the party of obstructionism, with an intolerance that seems to view any form of cooperation or compromise as a type of blasphemy not to be tolerated.  The Tea Party could become a truly influential movement, but without a true agenda apart from big government being a bad thing, chances are it will eventually implode or begin to splinter into various factions.

This is a perfect opportunity for the Republicans to swoop in and capitalize on the current anger and dissatisfaction in the country, but without a strategic media campaign that reaches out to and resonates with the voters; it could well be a missed opportunity

Copyright © Anthony Mora 2010

-
About the Author:
Anthony Mora began his media career as a freelance journalist for such publications as Us, Rolling Stone and other local and national publications. He served as editor-in-chief of two Los Angeles-based entertainment and lifestyle-oriented publications, and co-founded Phillips & Mora Entertainment, a public relations and personal management company, which ventured into video and film production. In 1990, Anthony formed Anthony Mora Communications, Inc. a Los Angeles-based media relations company that specializes in media placement, image development, and media training. AMC Inc. has placed clients in: Time, Newsweek, 60 Minutes, CNN, The Wall Street Journal, The Oprah Winfrey Show, The New York Times, Los Angeles Times, and other local, national, and international media outlets. Anthony has been featured in: USA Today, Newsweek, The New York Times, The Los Angeles Times, The Wall Street Journal, The BBC, CNN, Entrepreneur, Fox News, MSNBC, and other media. He has written three books. The most recent, \”Spin to Win,\” is a step-by-step guide on how to define goals and utilize the power of the media to achieve success in any field. Practical and user-friendly, \”Spin to Win\” can be utilized by heads of major corporations, small business owners, and entrepreneurs.
Article Source

While it is common knowledge that the Taliban were strongly supported by Pakistan during the 80′s and 90′s, many of the military links between the Pakistan army and Taliban were kept active post 9/11 even. This goes against what Pakistan, as an ally of the United States, has supposedly been fighting against in the War on Terror for the past nine years.

Judging by the disclosed documents, Pakistani spy agency, the Inter Services Intelligence (ISI), allows representatives of its spy service to meet directly with the Taliban in secret strategy sessions to organize networks of militant groups that fight against American soldiers in Afghanistan, and even hatch plots to assassinate Afghan leaders.”

American commanders and policy makers react to this intel by having candid discussions with Pakistani Generals in air conditioned offices in Islamabad and promising $1 billion in aid per year along with modern weaponry. Even the White House National Security advisor called this morning’s leaks as destructive and hailed the combined “counter-terrorism cooperation” between the United States and Pakistan.

One has to ask who is double crossing whom? The Pakistanis, who are taking American money and working with the enemy? Or the US who, having full knowledge of ISI support for Taliban continues with a Pakistani alliance in the War on Terror?

Another integral question that is raised by this disclosure is in its timing. In the week where Secretary of State, Hilary Clinton and the Chairman Joint Chiefs of Staff, Admiral Mike Mullen had visited Pakistan on either side of a Kabul Conference, the release of these documents means that someone within the army is not happy with the way things are being handled on an official level. Any purpose of these documents other than to harm the US-Pakistan alliance is not missed here.

Meanwhile, Iranian media is reporting the leak as an exposé into the immense number of civilian casualties by American forces in Afghanistan. According to Press TV, the real figure of civilian casualties had previously been publically hidden and deliberately downplayed. Press TV’s account makes a brief mention of ISI involvement with the Taliban.

We invite our readers to express their views on whether the current approach to the War on Terror is the right way to go?

-
About the Author:

Article Source

Can Legislation Really Curb the Dangers of Texting While Driving or is the solution up to the consumer?

6,000 people lost their lives due to the consequence of sending a text or email while driving. And over 500,000 accidents were caused that resulted in serious injuries. We need a solution that addresses the problem not just laws for punishment

States are fast coming to grips with this phenomenon but not necessarily in a good way. Legislatures across the country are passing laws to make sending a text or email while driving a primary offense with fines into the hundreds for the first offense and in some cases jail time or temporary suspension of driving privileges for repeat offenses. But it’s very unlikely that people will stop sending texts or emails while behind the wheel because of a law mandating fines. Teenagers in particular are unlikely to adhere to these new laws. And adults – well more than likely they will also continue to send text and email while they drive – at least until they either take their own life by running off the road or sadly end the life of a child, a sister, a brother, a mother, a father or someone else.

Did you know that a recent study found people that send texts and emails while they drive are more dangerous than those that drive drunk? They become so engrossed in sending texts or responding to emails that they don’t even look up to pay attention to the road. At any given time there are nearly 800,000 people sending a texts or emails while they drive – do you want to be on the road with one of them?

According to handsfreemessaging.com, States laws like those passed in D.C and more recently in Michigan will either force cell phone manufacturers to come up with effective methods to block texts and emails being sent when a person is driving or push the consumer to a service that facilitates their text habits in a safer format.

But there are drawbacks that make it unlikely that the average user will want to use them. One such solution is a blocker that prevents you from sending text or reading your email while in your car. The problem with this solution is that the consumer doesn’t like having constraints put on their use of a device they feel they should be able to use as they please. Another solution is software loaded on your cell phone that will read you text and mail messages to you. The problem here is the limited capacity of the cell phone device – although cell phones, Smartphones in particular have increased processing power the text to speech software is a processor hog and can quickly drain the battery of the device. Also the software will not allow you to reply by dictating a text or email to be sent because of the intensive requirement of speech to text software. And in both cases the service or the software is tied to the mobile carrier and the phone itself. Additionally the software may not be compatible with all phones and certain carriers may not even offer the software.

While the best solution would be for people to simply stop sending text and emails while they drive, this isn’t likely to happen. An alternative would be a service that allows you to have text messages and emails read to you while providing the capability of replying to those messages in real time using your cell phone and a hands free headset. The service would also have to be independent of the cell provider so that the consumer doesn’t become locked into one company thus denying them the opportunity to shop for the best deals on cell phone service.

According to handsfreemessaging.com, “The current “No Phone Zone movement” being pushed by celebrities like Oprah Winfrey is helping to bring this problem into the forefront and garner additional media addition to focus on an issue that will do nothing but get worst if solutions aren’t found.

While laws provide some incentives to consumers to put the phone down and focus on the road it is ultimately the consumer that will determine how this problem can be effective resolved not state of national legislatures.

-
About the Author:

Article Source