<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>LettersToTheEditor.com &#187; mainstream media</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.letterstotheeditor.com/tag/mainstream-media/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.letterstotheeditor.com</link>
	<description>&#34;The test of democracy is freedom of criticism.&#34;  ~David Ben-Gurion</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 19:35:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Should You Read Good News?</title>
		<link>http://www.letterstotheeditor.com/2009/09/28/should-you-read-good-news/</link>
		<comments>http://www.letterstotheeditor.com/2009/09/28/should-you-read-good-news/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 00:51:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Editors</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Letters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Best Letters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Florida]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinions By Category]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[good news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[independent newspapers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mainstream media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[negativity in news media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tampa Bay Informer]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.letterstotheeditor.com/?p=991</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[To the Editor: These days, we are bombarded with bad news by the mainstream media. We can scarcely open a newspaper or turn on the TV without being faced with the latest &#8220;scare-story&#8221; about swine flu, or another bank failure, &#8230; <a href="http://www.letterstotheeditor.com/2009/09/28/should-you-read-good-news/" style="float:right;">read more <span class="meta-nav">&#187;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>To the Editor:</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://www.letterstotheeditor.com/2009/09/28/should-you-read-good-news/istock_000008141839xsmall-3/" rel="attachment wp-att-993"><img src="http://www.letterstotheeditor.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/iStock_000008141839XSmall2-300x225.jpg" alt="iStock_000008141839XSmall" title="iStock_000008141839XSmall" width="300" height="225" class="alignright size-medium wp-image-993" /></a>These days, we are bombarded with bad news by the mainstream media. We can scarcely open a newspaper or turn on the TV without being faced with the latest &#8220;scare-story&#8221; about swine flu, or another bank failure, or another trillion-dollars added to the national budget&#8217;s deficit. Reports giving dire warning of bad times getting worse and no hope on the horizon tend to be prevalent. It seems as even the mundane stories get a negative spin on them.  </p>
<p>Do you, like me, get a headache or feel depressed or stressed after reading your city&#8217;s #1 paper? It&#8217;s because the constant bombardment of bad news by the mainstream media scares people, cultivating a pessimism that at best doesn&#8217;t make life any more livable. Those exposed to negativity on a daily basis tend to fall into agreement with the negativity. For instance, if someone was told every day for a decade that he couldn&#8217;t succeed in life, do you think in 10 years he would be successful? Most likely not. It is a constant invalidation and assault on people&#8217;s hopes and dreams for a better future. Why expose yourself to it? Shouldn&#8217;t it be possible to inform yourself honestly and accurately about the world and affairs around you, without being bombarded with pessimism and negativity?</p>
<p>My pet peeves with the mainstream media is that problems are presented, often hyped, but no solutions are offered. Reports are often generalized, without providing facts or solutions on how to make things better. I find that if you really know about something, it cannot &#8220;come around and bite you in the butt.&#8221;</p>
<p>I believe it is possible to inform yourself honestly and accurately about the world around you without making yourself feel hopeless about what is going on. Most of the time, things aren&#8217;t as bad as they seem. Supposedly, we&#8217;re in the worst recession of all time, and on the edge of a depression. But if you look around you, you will see no breadlines or Hoovervilles. You will see people going to work every day, driving their cars, going to Starbucks. I even see new businesses opening on the street where I work!</p>
<p>There has been a lie spread around, that &#8220;bad news sells&#8221;, but I don&#8217;t believe it. People want good news. People want facts.</p>
<p>If you put your attention on negativity, you get negativity. If you put your attention on positivity, you get positivity. It&#8217;s that simple. Educate yourself properly. Don&#8217;t get your information from biased, pessimistic news channels or papers, serving their advertisers and their ratings best interest, not yours. Get positive, local, good news, from a paper that is working for a better community. It makes a difference.</p>
<p><strong>Sincerely,<br />
<a href="http://ezinearticles.com/?expert=Angela_LeMay">Angela LeMay</a></strong></p>
<p><em> LeMay is the editor-in-chief of the Tampa Bay Informer &#8211; &#8220;The Good News Newspaper&#8221;. The purpose of the Tampa Bay Informer is to improve the community by raising awareness, responsibility and providing solutions to community issues. The Tampa Bay Informer is available in print, or online at [http://www.tampabayinformer.com]http://www.tampabayinformer.com. Source: http://EzineArticles.com/?expert=Angela_LeMay http://EzineArticles.com/?Should-You-Read-Good-News?&#038;id=2812401</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.letterstotheeditor.com/2009/09/28/should-you-read-good-news/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Three Reasons Media Bias Proven in U.S. Election</title>
		<link>http://www.letterstotheeditor.com/2008/11/01/two-facts-about-media-bias-proven-in-us-election/</link>
		<comments>http://www.letterstotheeditor.com/2008/11/01/two-facts-about-media-bias-proven-in-us-election/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Nov 2008 04:34:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Editors</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Letters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinions By Category]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[brit hume]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[center for media and public affairs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[john mccain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[l a times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mainstream media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Bashers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[newspapers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[white house]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.letterstotheeditor.com/?p=97</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[To The Editor: Well, Friday&#8217;s study of 979 news stories by the non-partisan Center for Media and Public Affairs proves what any U.S. political observer knows to be true: The media are highly biased against John McCain. The study showed &#8230; <a href="http://www.letterstotheeditor.com/2008/11/01/two-facts-about-media-bias-proven-in-us-election/" style="float:right;">read more <span class="meta-nav">&#187;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>To The Editor:</strong></p>
<p>Well, Friday&#8217;s  study of 979 news stories by the non-partisan Center for Media and Public Affairs proves what any U.S. political observer knows to be true: The media are highly biased against John McCain. The <a href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20081101/ap_on_el_pr/campaign_media;_ylt=ApQg3O93PdaM_QgPpzxQMRXXn414">study showed</a> 65 percent of the stories favor Obama; only 31 percent were favorable of McCain.<br />
<div id="attachment_92" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 310px"><a href="http://www.letterstotheeditor.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/10/istock_000005778419xsmall.jpg"><img src="http://www.letterstotheeditor.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/10/istock_000005778419xsmall-300x200.jpg" alt="Media bias has ruined this election." title="istock_000005778419xsmall" width="300" height="200" class="size-medium wp-image-92" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Media bias has ruined this election.</p></div>This is pretty telling for three reasons:<br />
1) McCain has long courted media approval in his career, but it hasn&#8217;t mattered. Shows what sucking up to reporters can get you.<br />
2) I don&#8217;t ever hear any of the media pundits refuting the point that Obama is riding a media honeymoon into the White House. The L. A. Times is withholding a controversial video about Obama for example.<br />
3) The study showed the most fair broadcast of the major networks (the study excluded CNN and NBC) was Brit Hume&#8217;s Fox broadcasts. Even then, it was not perfectly balanced &#8212; 39 percent favorable stories to McCain and 28 percent favorable for Obama.<br />
Is it any surprise that the mainstream media, especially newspapers, are losing their readers and viewers en masse?<br />
Just give it to us straight please!</p>
<p>Sincerely,<br />
John Harrington<br />
Virginia</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.letterstotheeditor.com/2008/11/01/two-facts-about-media-bias-proven-in-us-election/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

